 |
|
House votes to end slaughter of horses
for food
Staff and Wire Reports
WASHINGTON - The House voted Wednesday on legislation that would
reportedly stop the slaughter of American horses to feed diners in
European and Asian nations where the meat is considered gourmet fare.
The 269-158 vote on an amendment to a Department of Agriculture spending
bill strips funding from the USDA to inspect any horse meat to be
shipped overseas for consumption, effectively barring the sale of horse
meat for human consumption, according to the Associated Press.
Roughly 65,000 wild horses, race horses, work horses and even pet horses
are slaughtered every year in the United States to become steaks in
other countries. Two plants in Texas and one in DeKalb slaughter horses
for foreign consumption.
Jim Tucker, manager of DeKalb's Cavel International Inc. at 108
Harvestore Drive., refuted the Associated Press claim that, if enacted
into law, this amendment would shut down horse slaughterhouses.
Instead, the amendment would stop the federal government from funding
horse meat inspections, but slaughtering plants could pay for
inspections themselves, he said.
"This would have an effect, but it wouldn't shut us down," Tucker said.
The plant currently pays for some steps in the inspection process that
are required by the European Union but not the United States for
consumption of the meat.
Brad Hahn, press secretary for Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Plano, said
lawyers will have to interpret the amendment, which isn't clear on
whether the plants can pay for the inspections themselves.
"We're hopeful it never reaches that point," Hahn said, adding that
Hastert is worried about the impact this amendment could have on a
profitable business in his district. The legislation still has to
receive Senate support and go through several more steps before becoming
law, Hahn said.
The amendment was pushed by Rep. John Sweeney, R-N.Y., whose district
includes the historic Saratoga race track, and Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky.,
a thoroughbred owner.
"This breaks a bunch of barriers that have been put in our way over the
past two years and takes us a big step closer to getting this enacted
into law," Sweeney said. "It is unconscionable that for decades, we have
been using federal taxpayer dollars to support a practice that the
American public is overwhelmingly opposed to."
Sweeney and Whitfield unsuccessfully tried in years past to get a
similar ban passed, even enlisting the help of Bo Derek and other
celebrity horse lovers.
Those efforts were blocked by House Agriculture Committee chairman Bob
Goodlatte, R-Va., who had not let the issue out of committee, saying a
ban on horse slaughter for foreign consumption could lead to abuse of
unwanted animals.
This time Sweeney got a vote on an amendment to a spending bill and won
the support of a majority of the chamber.
Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., a veterinarian, is set to push a similar ban
in the Senate.
"This is not very well-thought out," Tucker said. He said the House
should have considered the people who work in the industry that will
lose money because of having to pay for inspections. Cavel employs 40
people, he said, and thousands of horse owners have gained money from
the slaughterhouse.
He said public health could suffer if the government begins to "chip
away" at the foods it inspects, and the government also will hurt a
viable foreign trade market by making slaughterhouse operations more
expensive.
The issue of slaughtering horses came under renewed scrutiny in April
after 41 wild horses were killed at Cavel, under a new law allowing the
government to sell horses and burros roaming free on public lands in
western states.
The House voted in May to stop the Bureau of Land Management from using
any money to sell horses on those lands, restoring what had been a
33-year-old policy of protecting wild horses from sale or processing.
Staff Writer Renee Messacar contributed to this report.
Read more
Back to Endangered Animal News |